-11-
16
of the access road to the Jubilee Reservoir (see map).
The road which would be followed is narrow and tortuous in
places and at some points rises to such an elevation that
tunnels it a lower level would be necessary,
Pipes in Roadway.
54. It would not be possible to lay the pipes below
the existing roadway without interfering with the traffic to
a serious extent, and therefore it is assumed that the roadway
would be widened, which is desirable in any event, the pipes
being laid below the widened portion.
55. Owing to the steep mountain slopes a considerable
amount of excavation would be necessary even to lay a single
line of pipes, which would be greatly increased if the road
had to be again widened to take a second pipe line.
It is
therefore recommended that pipes be laid in the first
instance of such diameter as to be capable of discharging
40 million gallons per diem, i.e. the whele yield of the
reservoir when the catchwaters have been constructed plus 33%
to meet periods of increased demand.
Tunnel Portions.
56.
Comparative estimates show that there would be but
little difference in the cost per foot run whether the aqueduct
took the form of a pressure tunnel or a pipeline laid in the
widened portion of the road.
57.
It was therefore decided that it would be advantageous
to shorten the line by means of the tunnels shown on the map,
which would also avoid those portions of the road which lay at
too high an elevation to allow of the water being discharged by
gravity to the filters.
58.
The total length of the aqueduct between the outlet
of the tunnel and the filters would be about 64 miles, the pipe
being laid in the widened portion of the road for about 4.3 miles.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.